Pertman shares that the stereotype at
the time depicted birth fathers in one of two unappealing ways, “They’re these
terrible men who are either going out the door or are in some way interfering
with the adoption” (152). None of the men whose stories we read fit in either
of these categories. All of these men
wanted to do what was best for their child and for the mother of their child.
The decision that was made was not one that was easy for them to decide (not
that they had much of a say) and they suffered side effects for years because
of that decision of adoption.
Steve’s situation was slightly
different than these three other men. He was not in a relationship with the
mother of his child; in fact it was a one night stand and they had little
communication before or after. Like some of the other men, he didn’t know about
the pregnancy until months later. However, once he found out he did take
responsibility. He knew that he couldn’t be a parent at that time in his life
and he knew that it was best for everyone to go through with an adoption. Steve
neither ran away nor got in the way of the adoption; going against the
stereotype.
I found it very interesting to hear his
story as a birthfather. Rarely are the stories and experiences of the
birthfathers made public, especially those birthfathers from the 1960s and
1970s. During a time that these men had no rights whatsoever, the fact that
Steve accepted that and took what responsibility he could really impressed me.
Even thirty years later when changes have come with regards to adoptions and
birthparents, he had very few rights legally and if Jen hadn’t searched for
him, he may never have met her. From what I could see, both Steve and Jen
benefited from meeting each other. They both learned a little bit more about
themselves and Steve was able to fill that gap that took him thirty years to
realize was missing.
Lindsey E.
Lindsey E.
No comments:
Post a Comment