Friday, February 1, 2013

Blogpost #2, Gretchen Mach



After reading Solinger’s Claming Rights in the Era of Chocie, Part 1:Awakenings, I was shocked to learn the amount of ridicule and scrutiny that unwed, pregnant women experienced in the 1940’s to the 1970’s. Before reading, I had a basic understanding of how unmarried pregnancy was seen as shameful and intolerable to both the pregnant woman and her family. However, it was disturbing to discover how young women’s nonmaritial pregnancies led them to be defined as “deviants” (Solinger, 68), with some mothers being diagnosed as “psychologically disturbed” (Solinger, 69). The social implications as an outcome were equally unsettling. Family members became disregarded in the community and the pregnant women were unwelcome. For example, a personal account from a young woman explained that when asking for prenatal care, the family doctor rejected her request stating he “did not want an unwed pregnant girl in his office” (Solinger, 72).

The consequences of becoming pregnant before marriage translated into harsh punishment, not only from the community, but within the family itself. Another personal account from an unwed women recalls, “Either I gave up the baby for adoption or my father walked out, deserted the family, and divorced my mother” (Solinger, 72). What the daughter wanted for herself soon became overwhelming irrelevant. The opinion of the parents and pressure to give the child for adoption triumphed over any want that the daughter may have had. Even if the daughter did decide to keep her baby, she likely would be cut off from all resources including family support, money, or help from others due to fear of association. Some women’s’ reproductive rights were threatened, with one daughter explaining that if she did not agree to sign the adoption papers the father would “have the doctor sterilize me when he delivered the baby” (Solinger, 72).  

Overall, it was horrible but necessary to read first-hand accounts that unwed pregnant women experienced. Their right to be mothers was ripped from them as they were coerced to place their child up for adoption. The mental suffering, dehumanization, blatant criticism, the women experienced left many to become no longer whole as a person. One of the hardest accounts to read was how many denied the women to be mothers, themselves (Solinger, 73). After reading this passage, it made me grateful for how female sexuality and reproductive control is now prevalent and utilized today. While unwed pregnancy still holds a social stigma, the ability to decide how to proceed with the pregnancy is more protected under the choice of the mother.

Gretchen Mach 

1 comment:

  1. Graded Reply 2

    Gretchen, I very much agree with your response to the treatment of women at this time as shocking and horrible. The personal stories are just a few of many that draw attention to the inequalities and injustices faced by unwed mothers. You mentioned that you are grateful that today female sexuality and reproductive control is more prevalent and utilized. I am interested to know how you came to that conclusion and where you see examples of this in society. I do agree with you and I see access to birth control and information on the internet as just two examples. Also, what do you think made it possible for society to change and make it possible for these 'choices' to become more of the mothers'? You talk about how in the past deciding to keep the baby would really mean getting cut off from all types of support - familial, monetary, etc. In reality, that wasn't really a choice for these mothers and you do a good job of noticing that in your analysis. It's cool to see how we as a society have changed from diagnosing women with psychological disorders because they were pregnant to being more supportive and accepting. Based on our class discussion I do think we still have a long way to go... but we're heading in the right direction!

    --Sarah R.

    ReplyDelete