In the past, when thinking about adoption, I was always
somewhat confused and unsure about open adoptions. I thought that it would be slightly
awkward for all involved and would make the situation more difficult for the
biological parent(s) and more confusing for the child. Since taking this class,
doing the readings and listening to speakers though, I am starting to
understand that the majority of that is untrue.
Pertman discusses in his book how biological mothers
struggle with giving their child up, even those most confident and assured of
their decision. They all usually experience some guilt and second guess their
decision as well as their self-worth. This decision is not an easy one to make
and “the insecurities of biological parents, particularly mothers, often run
deepest of all – especially when their sense of loss isn't alleviated by
contact with, or even information about, the children they carried” (144).
Having an open adoption allows the biological parent(s) to maintain confidence
that they made the right decision and often allows them to have a relationship
with their child. It may seem confusing to someone outside the situation but
for those involved it becomes their normal.
Mishon talked as well about the wellbeing of the biological
mother. A question that came up was about who the client was at Catholic Charities.
For them, the biological mother is the primary client and what she wants is
priority. It is true that the adoptive couples are also their clients but they
are more secondary. And overall the child’s best interests are taken into
account. I really liked how she explained it. It gives the biological mother
the control in the situation which helps her make the best decision for her and
for her child. After listening to Mishon
talk about what all Catholic Charities does and I was surprised initially by
the low number of closed adoptions they do and that the vast majority of them
were open or semi-open adoptions. The range of open adoptions was also
something I had not known about previously; I had always believed that if it
was open then it was completely open.
I had always thought that closed adoptions were the norm but
after listening to her explain how open adoptions work it definitely made more
sense to me why they are becoming more and more common. Like Pertman discussed,
the insecurity of biological parents is something that would be incredibly
difficult to deal with and having some kind of connection with your child can
make a huge difference in a biological parent’s confidence in their decision to
allow their child to be adopted. The extent to which the adoption is open is up
to the biological parent but the adoptive parents agree to a completely open
adoption before the process even begins, allowing for flexibility in the
relationship between the child and biological parents. There are boundaries of
course and although I had previously thought that having the biological parent
in the child’s life would complicate things (they may want to have a say in how
the child is raised for example) I now see that those boundaries are pretty
clear from the start. The biological parent is able to see that their child is
getting the best life possible and they are provided with the opportunity for a
relationship when they are ready. It does not force a relationship and at the
same time it doesn’t prevent a relationship.
Lindsey E.
No comments:
Post a Comment